If you want a social media platform that allows the spread disinformation favorable to your politics, go make one. There is no First Amendment right to stand on someone else’s soapbox.
-
-
Replying to @radleybalko
why have you become, Bad i respected you once
12 replies 2 retweets 126 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot @radleybalko
I don't think he's bad, I think the Trump era just eventually breaks anyone with any leftist tendencies. The civil libertarians are finally succumbing. I'm still hopeful he (like a certain Catholic Headwear account) can recover when this is all over.
5 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
No it's a matter of seeing that this will be applied against leftist journalism also. Yeah the Post is bullshit, so are a lot of outlets. Doesn't mean I want social media companies to make that choice, especially without prior standards put out. Put a notice, don't block it.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @flipper_nipple @CryptoSaro and
They aren’t “making a choice” though, all that info is still available, but they absolutely have the right to decide what goes on their platform
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kygirl93 @CryptoSaro and
Right and they should be transparent about their policies before they start enforcing them. People know the Post is shir because we can see the articles they put out. Hiding their shit away doesn't make it disappear.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @flipper_nipple @CryptoSaro and
The policies are transparent to all who bother to read them and they have rules against posting hacked material, since that’s a crime. This has nothing to do with anyone’s beliefs. Regardless, they are not discriminating against a protected class, they can allow what they want
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
my policy is that tendentious people should untag me
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.