I suppose, but outright stealing an election (or attempting to) and forcing certain elements of the state to act against itself in a worst case scenario is wildly worse and more disruptive PR than a rehashing of FDR’s plan in response to GOP hypocrisy.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @SqpTemple03 @eigenrobot
I don’t see him as a paragon, I see him as someone who got things done and led the state through a difficult time. And I never said it was a “moral” plan. I personally don’t care if it is or isn’t. Why should I?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @SqpTemple03 @eigenrobot
You should understand that at this point, I *really* do not care. The ruling party is an existential threat to the union. Whatever needs to be done to prevent a slide into serious civil unrest, I support.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
And right now, out of 3 scenarios, the only one I see ending the closest to boring normality is the one that does not include the walking chaos machine inhabiting office by January 20th.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @SqpTemple03 @eigenrobot
I don’t care. We can deal with the aftermath, and it’s preferable to deal with that aftermath rather than dealing with whatever happens if someone besides Donald is not the executive authority. And if they get enough votes for expanding the court, I’d say there’s a mandate.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.