Apparently, I talk like one too (though I cannot see it myself, others swear by it).
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Anyway, I digress: the answer to your question is “sadly, no”.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @UtilityMonster2 @_djpn
I'm sorry for picking on you :( will delete QT in a minute Generally it's polite and clever to not respond to people calling you dumb by protesting that you're smart, and it's an especially bad move to try providing documentation
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @eigenrobot @_djpn
You don’t have to delete it. I’m aware: I took that photo last night, with the express purpose of causing a ‘ruckus’ today, in order to draw or tempt even a small number of people into the utilitarian world.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
People in that particular community can’t go an hour without accusing people of being midwits; as soon as that happened, the picture was posted, and the fun began. Then they got to learn about the great Derek Parfit.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @eigenrobot @_djpn
I don’t follow you. To be clear: people calling me names on the internet is absolutely fine. This particular community likes bell curves and dislikes Pinker. “Oh, given these facts, I know how to provide them with the perfect bait”, I thought. So I did.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @UtilityMonster2 @_djpn
I guess the issue is this conspicuously taking yuorself seriously which is the fastest way to come off badly in these part's anyway i wish you a pleasant evening and good luck
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot @_djpn
Right, now I get it. Your “doing it again” makes more sense now. But to be clear (and yes, I know I’m conspicuously taking myself seriously here), I am not looking to build up popularity. Just trying to get people to read Parfit!
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
u are the Last Good Boy
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.