but it's still tedious I'm not OFFENDED by the thread (well, not much), but it seems like intentionally digging into mundane details as an attempt to derail / poke fun
-
-
Replying to @MorlockP @eigenrobot
"women have the right not to be raped" what chemical is this right made of? "what? no, what I'm saying is that physical autonomy is the most important -" so are rights acids or bases? "wait, what?" I'm discussing in good faith! "are - are you? ok, well, I accept that..."
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP @eigenrobot
so are rights made out of _ENERGY_ then? Is that what you're saying? My point isn't re sacredness norms. I'm perfectly happy to discuss if Jesus was a person who lived or not, if he was divine or not ... but approaching a topic at 90 degrees seems less respectful than than 180
1 reply 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP @eigenrobot
It seems inherently to be mockery, and of a low fedora sort (even though you assert it's not). Did Jesus even HAVE DNA? I dunno. Doesn't matter. God can create a universe; he can create a body with no DNA, with cloned DNA, etc etc etc
3 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP @eigenrobot
also, I'm not convinced that DNA existed until around 1950, but that's a longer debate
7 replies 1 retweet 16 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP
I am intensely curious about this To the rest though I hate it Morlock I just want to be able to get excited about things without other people taking advantage of it to be unfathomably rude to other people Didn't even occur to me until 3d tweet it was fedora bait -_-
4 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot
> excited about things this is Good, and I applaud it > unfathomably rude are you saying that I'm being unfathomably rude ?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP
no no not at all I'm anticipating other people like screencapping the thread with "CHECKMATE CHRISTIANS" ahit
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot
well, the following probably goes unsaid, but - being Intensely Curious is good - please continue - I find this PARTICULAR curiousity to border fedora-land missing-the-pointness, but /shrug - we will discuss how God and/or The Simulators created DNA in 1950 some other time
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP @eigenrobot
This tribe is borderline 'sperg (some of us more borderline than others), so I would expect offensive topics to come up regularly without intent to offend. Note: icky to me, but I'll grant it's an interesting question. I can even think of how it leads to "proving" divinity.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
on a first pass it didnt even occur to me to think of this as putting God to the test I was just delighted by the notion of a Homoousion divine genome and was imagining what that would even look like The notion of it somehow contradicting theology was absent Interesting
-
-
Replying to @eigenrobot @MorlockP
There are things that contradict theology on the surface (evolution) but on the other hand demonstrate that barely possible events in the realm of probability (humans) have happened. A most elegant and intricate mechanism that ends up with an conscious, intelligent species.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
It's as if someone came up with *just* the right rules for that.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.