lol thats not how it works no
-
-
Replying to @halvorz @phil49472744 and
I'm sorry, are you saying they're deliberately masking the data to avoid further scrutiny, or something else? Is AHCA patient privacy legislation or something else like the journal?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheSuppressed86 @halvorz and
I poorly worded that. But datasets in studies like this are typically readily available with anonymized data, correct?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TheSuppressed86 @phil49472744 and
it very much depends on the dataset sometimes it can be anonymized, sometimes not
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @halvorz @TheSuppressed86 and
you dont need to see the data you can just ignore the paper
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot @TheSuppressed86 and
honestly this one looks somewhat interesting to me I have yet to see a really convincing explanation of the infant mortality gap and I can't say I find the hypothesis here wildly implausible effect size concerningly high tho
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @halvorz @TheSuppressed86 and
yes yes it is I promise you this study is fake
3 replies 0 retweets 12 likes -
-
-
Replying to @eigenrobot @halvorz and
my gf is from minnesota what's the lowdown?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
theyre constantly making Epimenides jokes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
