hell yeah I found the 1963 paper (misread as 1936 originally)
-
Show this thread
-
2 replies 3 retweets 38 likesShow this thread -
1 reply 1 retweet 34 likesShow this thread -
1 reply 1 retweet 31 likesShow this thread -
the paper goes on to suggest that it's important the urine not be distilled
1 reply 0 retweets 42 likesShow this thread -
1 reply 0 retweets 37 likesShow this thread -
-
I am not going to be as thorough as these guys
1 reply 0 retweets 31 likesShow this thread -
the cool thing is that they used male urine samples as well as non-pregnant female samples so it should work as a control to use
@eigenrobot's if he's willing to pee on some barley every morning for a few days5 replies 0 retweets 69 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @zrkrlc @selentelechia
We discussed this unlikely case "I am taking you to the doctor"
8:30 AM - 28 Jul 2020
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
