More than that, it’s telling that the 4th screencap has its force precisely because it describes *actual violence* involving harm to people. If you want to say destroying property itself is violence, you can’t use a case involving harm to people to make your point.https://twitter.com/willwilkinson/status/1285941682865938433 …
-
-
Replying to @jttiehen
Though I'm not sure unintentionally harming someone in an arson counts as violence any more than would, say, a death caused by a drunk driver.
64 replies 3 retweets 5 likes
Replying to @willwilkinson @jttiehen
extraordinary
4:00 PM - 22 Jul 2020
0 replies
2 retweets
15 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.