if you knew that a tsarist had arguments that you would find persuasive and convince you of the need to support the Romanov heir, would you let them speak to you?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- End of conversation
-
-
-
does category "infohazard" contain "two girls one cup" and "roko's basilisk" and "convincing argument for reprehensible position"? if so I think your "infohazard" category breadth renders this question unanswerable, particularly given the judginess of the non-yes answer title.
-
also, in your ontology, are gaslighting (as one example of brainwashing) experiences infohazards or something else?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
pillpilled took the pill that taught me to always take the pill
-
mobius offers the red pill and the blue bill
@alth0u takes both - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This poll is an infohazard
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
getting into Buddhism convinced me rationalists have a faulty ontology and infohazards aren't real
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.