hmm
@amber_athey at @SpectatorUSA has a piece
pro Scott natch, rides the privacy angle hard
still not stoked about right media bias in coverage, feels like another bit of partisan war which might be counterproductivehttps://spectator.us/new-york-times-private-slate-star-codex-blog/ …
-
-
I tried reading it and it was just too boring - I think they’re mad that we write free content for each other and want it to stop?
-
the call for a licensing regime for literacy was near the end yeah
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
yup, the NYer article was skewed, but fairly gently, against our position. notably it leaves out the context that the Woke Terror makes doxxing especially scary and it assumes that ever taking a right-wing position on anything is
#problematic. but aside from that it was OK.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This guy apparently wrote a hit job on David Reich so it wouldn't surprise me
End of conversation
-
-
-
I like that our community was "rightly" criticized for entertaining the idea of "biological differences between the sexes."
pic.twitter.com/tM9pUWJBWQ
-
some part of me hopes that "rightly" was a subtle pun
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
the smug oozing out of these two sentences is so heavy, my desk has collapsedpic.twitter.com/sU6NqaLTto
-
Oh, it's not smugness. Read carefully, it's actually envy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
seems basically fine if this had been the NYT story I wouldn't feel like I had something to be outraged about
-
well they avoided publishing the name
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.