Thinking a lot about the definition of "religion" in the first amendment. 2A antagonists spend a lot of time talking about how technological advances have made the original language ill-suited to modern contexts. I am thinking this is a more apt critique of 1A.
-
-
I don't mean to argue about this on the merits, however, so much as consider what it would mean if Social Justice were treated as a religion.
Show this thread -
This is an entire separate thread, bookmarking for later. I am tired and want some dinner.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Do you think it's more socially advantageous for it to become a formal religion? For example, The Satanic Temple is essentially an activist group, but is legally considered a formal religion - which I guess benefits their goals.
-
That is the issue. Advantageous, and for whom?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.