my understanding of mice, cancer and telemeres has been greatly increased by following bret.
-
-
-
any proof of this claim?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
nope.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
So, you can assure that we haven't learned anything about telomeres but you have no proof?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
proof is an extremely odd word to use in this context
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
alright, what word should I use? I hope you know what I mean at least.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
not really no
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
See, my problem is that according to your claim. Listening to Bret can't expand your understanding of telomeres, but I didn't even know what a telomere was before i started listening, so you're objectively wrong. I have degrees in Computer Science & Musicology - not biology.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @platonist @halvorz and
I was genuinely interested why you disagree with Bret, so I asked for evidence that he's wrong. What's so hard to understand?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
stahp
-
-
Shh, I'm not talking to you
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.