thoughts from a Literal Tank whose comments on such matters are naturally to be trustedhttps://twitter.com/PhilthyPhil2012/status/1278450723345350656?s=19 …
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
He’s right, but I wonder if he knows how extensive Taiwan’s domestic missile capabilities are?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
me looking at Taiwan's 4 nuclear plants, short ranged rockets, and my Modern Physics textbook
-
also I am pretty sure based on its context this book is PROBABLY an ITAR item
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Facts. The M1 sale was mostly for show, as if they even need tanks they should go with some of the more local MBTs that were designed for fights in the region, not a Cold War legacy tank better suited for rolling hills and massed armor attacks.
-
The one thing it does have is survivability in the defense (the original design meant to trade multiple Soviet tanks per Abrams loss) but the export variants are actually particularly shitty against AT rockets in that regard.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@iingwen remains strapped. Let Xi come and get clapped.pic.twitter.com/GUFBRIvsM7
-
Also I'm low key convinced Taiwan has a nuke. They've come close way too many times just to "stop" and not do anything with the program.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.