(draft) some levels of tolerance in the SSC sense 1. actively supporting/defending outgroups weird habits 2. paying Outgroup no mind 3. avoiding Outgroup when possible 4. taking actions likely to harm Outgroup (negligent) 5. taking actions likely to harm Outgroup (malice)
-
-
And when there are genuine and insoluble disputes between groups (1) is likely impossible in any case. Inna final analysis (2) and (3) are pretty good compared to the set of likely alternatives.
Show this thread -
New conversation -
-
-
Trying to force (1) *at all* is asking for trouble. America has proven to be exceedingly tolerant and ambivalent to basically any group (maybe to a fault?). There will always be a significant segment for which ‘force’ is futile or counterproductive. This goes for any issue.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1 and 5 are in a dynamic tension such that they slingshot. Coercion of 1 can lead to 5. Repulsion at 5 can lead to 1.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.