lets test your Courage part I (part II posted later) trophy hunters will often pay tens of thousands of dollar's to a wildlife refuge to take a charismatic megafaunum. these dollars are retained by the refuge to support and protect their animals. is this good
-
-
hidden behind both options is shameful under-resourcing, and failure before you reach the point of the option. It's in that context that ugly choices get forced. It's less of a dilemma then the selection of a clean-up plan
-
it's for sure a "Sophie's choice" setup. Given all of these problems before the fact, which bad option do you pick? The name of the game is to not be in that situation to begin with. Once you are, there's not really any winning
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.