this characterization is interesting to me for reasons I am not at liberty to share overall I would deliver a metacharacterization of hilariously wrong
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
we just do math at our day jobs and its fucking boring to talk about it off the clock
- Show replies
-
-
-
My experience doesn't really lead me one way or the other. Why do you lean this way?
-
attending rat and postrat parties mostly
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I was about to complain but I think you're right, esp about pure math, it's very literary
-
"Pure math" might just be an apt signal. Akin to prescriptivism within the language crew.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
i would guess you're wrong, but not w/ especially high confidence
-
the best part is no one has any way of disproving my claim
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If Bayesianism is a revelation to for someone, they probably didn't have coursework using that framework, which implies some mild selection effect
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.