referring earlier to comments re: internal journo comms, I think there is actually significance to these public statements by journalists for forming consensus around standards of practice consider the effect in your own circles of prominent figures taking such stances openly
-
-
well well well this was perhaps inevitable NYT has a slack channel with 2000(!!) users apparent at least one dislikes what NYT is doing so much that he leaked news of the internal Discourse to
@thedailybeast ht@QiaochuYuan https://twitter.com/karolkarpinski/status/1276220747468414977?s=19 …This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
as I think I mentioned above or elsewhere, hunch is that this gets resolved on the basis of dynamics internal to journalism as a profession or perhaps as a consequence of social structure of
@nytimes itselfShow this thread -
Looks like the story is in fact not dead https://twitter.com/asglidden/status/1278459220174573568?s=19 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
hmm elsewhere,,, https://twitter.com/spakhm/status/1278223873951989761?s=19 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
hmmmm veers from balanced to loving to occasionally schoolmarm-ish seems like there's not much story left for NYT unless it's "we talked to everyone with an axe to grind against Scott, who is now a Public Figure after New Yorker wrote on him" (??) https://www.newyorker.com/culture/annals-of-inquiry/slate-star-codex-and-silicon-valleys-war-against-the-media …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You're a robot, you don't even wear clothes
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.