I can see this Imagine reading a paper https://twitter.com/liminal_warmth/status/1275975806137757696 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
I have not been reading Lim's other tweets because I am a bad friend but skimming some comments by eg
@danlistensto I'm imagining something like: Past rounds of police reform have been badly-designed bureaucratic mechanisms that took no account of 2d order effects1 reply 0 retweets 22 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @guyatthediner @danlistensto
I'm suspecting that training is less the issue than incentives (I think most training is possibly fake) but of course I would say that my hunch is that although there are insane abuses by police, there are also a bunch of constraints on how police departments can be structured,
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot @danlistensto
and these are not immediately visible to the public. Eg, if police are punished for using force injustly and there's not a bright line between just and unjust as you said, I would expect police will respond by simply not responding to calls that might call for force to be used.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot @danlistensto
And then people will be mad at police and politicians and then what? Maybe you could compensate them more to get them to take such risks but then of course you see people wanting to defund the police and states and cities are already going to get hammered by pensions
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot @danlistensto
Just spitballing but the stable point might end up being pervasive surveillance Welp
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
I think that's mostly how gun control works :/
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.