Will you defend SlateStarCodex publicly if it comes to it?
-
Show this thread
-
-
Replying to @eigenrobot @orthonormalist
Dude, I don't know this orthonormalist guy, but going of that ssc thread there's basically no justification for assuming it's going to be a bad article. This seems like hysteria and "YES I WILL FIGHT GRR" over nothing and tbh it's kind of embarrassing.
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @sullyj3 @orthonormalist
I understand where you're coming from In the spirit of the pantheon, would you like to make a bet? And at what odds?
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot @orthonormalist
Sure, I'm willing to go $20 to $10
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @sullyj3 @orthonormalist
Probably good! What criteria; and who judges?
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot @orthonormalist
I reckon you're an honorable guy, I'm happy for you to judge using whatever criteria you deem fit.
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @sullyj3 @orthonormalist
Appealing to honor! Hahaha extremely effective move honestly. Major things I am worried about seeing: 1. Sn*erclub given prominence 2. "Concern" about policy influence 3. Attention drawn to drama around sexual assault allegations 4. Something something Racism 5. Scott doxxed
2 replies 0 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot @orthonormalist
I'm happy with those, although I'd say mentioning that policy is possibly influenced with neutral valence seems likely and IMO shouldn't count. Actual "concern" would.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
New conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
