Most of those people aren't Marxist-Leninist and I'm also opposed to outlawing nazism anyway. I'm totally okay with using violence against them when they violate the law and there is no better way to uphold it, but not for saying the stupid shit they believe.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Well, if they're conspiring to violate the law, this is itself a violation of the law and ought to be punished accordingly. But if people want to promote a type of society I reject as bad, and even if they promote violent action to achieve their goals, then as long as they are
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
not themselves taking steps to engage in violent action to do that, I'm opposed to punishing them. It's kind of blurry line, so there are some cases that aren't clear-cut, but usually they are.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Lmao, I don't have any such threshold, I'm opposed to killing anyone who isn't violating the law and even in that case I only condone the use of lethal force when there is no better way.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
what if they're advocating implementing these policies by constitutional amendment managed by the formal election of representatives who share their views
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
if your opponents took over the government would you feel cool about rising in armed revolt against them in spite of it being illegal? just trying to suss out a principle here
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.