Well yes and no
-
-
Replying to @eigenrobot @liminal_warmth
Any articles to explain that? I'm sure it would really cumbersome to explain that in Twitter format.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @seyrup @liminal_warmth
i cant even read!!!! naw i think my model is that the Fed intervention was necessary to prevent a total meltdown, but not sufficient and there are enough other weird things going on that im even more reluctant to pin this on anything than i usually am
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
The fed prevented a wave of bankruptcies with the promise of bond purchases, that's probably 50-60% of the story, low rates maybe another 10%? (having to wait a while for income is NBD with rates that low) the rest...idk
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @sgodofsk @eigenrobot and
supporting bankrupcty being part of the story is the outperformance of large cap over mid and small cap
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Won't these bond purchases inflate the value of the bonds themselves if not the currency?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
yes greater bond price = lower yield = lower cost of borrowing
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
So the upshot of this will be that cheap credit is going to dry up in the coming years, correct? If that does happen, the likelihood of War goes up. Contrary to what anyone might say, War is always a quest for resources. Rest all is propaganda.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I expect credit will cost whatever the federal reserve wants it to cost
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Aren't credit rates set based on the amount of annual inflation?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
well its a factor
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.