They’re hurt a lot by their most public figures being people like Hanson: https://twitter.com/khicksefficient/status/1247598121397387266?s=21 …https://twitter.com/KHicksEfficient/status/1247598121397387266 …
its just that most of the criticism is really boring what empirical claim(s) do you object to and why?
-
-
^ you’re sort of repeating his problem here. He deliberately avoids ever making empirical claims, and then claims only empirical criticisms, which he’s precluded, as valid. But to humor you, I’ll outline some issues -
-
It posits “sex inequality” and “income inequality” as being somehow similar to each other. “Why do the same people advocate for one but not the other?”. What about these things are similar? Their effects? Their structure? Their causes? Society’s tools to resolve them?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.