This was written in 1973, you're hardly keeping up, my dude. And follow up: why on God's green earth would I trust Magness over an impartial source on this subject?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @PPPowerLifts @bkharnish and
Why would include it? Anyone familiar with economics even a little bit knows all of these names already and when this incredibly significant event within economics occurred. The student newspaper does not personally benefit from any of these decisions, Phil Magness does.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wb_thorne @bkharnish and
But this is like arguing with a child about quantum physics; when you have some idea about the subject of conversation you can come back and talk about it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @PPPowerLifts @bkharnish and
A lawyer would tell you that someone is innocent until proven guilty, and your right-wing blog post isn't evidence and leave it at that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wb_thorne @bkharnish and
I don't care about defending Zucman, the guy is a superstar in Econ and needs no help. I am educating others reading this about *why* you've proved you don't know what you're talking about.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wb_thorne @bkharnish and
Anyone familiar with econ will know Harvard's sketchy history of dispatching leftists regardless of merit, and upon realizing that you don't know that history and yet are making a claim in this domain, will not take you seriously on this topic.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @PPPowerLifts @bkharnish and
Might as well ask a chiropractor.pic.twitter.com/CXOm28ppaa
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
CUNY Amherst did you come here after you got bullied off of EJMR
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.