amazed at everyones ability to think past the stage game here
-
-
It was actually the reason that Charles I was convicted of treason. The High Court held that he betrayed the English crown by invading with a foreign army.
-
Which I tend to agree with as a republican, but it's different in the Scotland had direct political ties to England, which isn't the case in other interventions. I guess it'd be more akin to a civil war in the EU than other cases.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.