If you are like me, you did not read Lenin in High School. You did not read him in college. You have never seen his ideas debated on TV. No politician has ever claimed to be inspired by him, or even mentioned his name. Strange, for someone so influential across the globe.
-
Show this thread
-
Why is it that in America, the supposed land of free speech, we cannot read or discuss someone who inspired millions of workers, and continues to inspire millions across the globe? The man whose ideology was the official State ideology of some of the largest countries on Earth.
16 replies 68 retweets 1,110 likesShow this thread -
Despite his immense influence, if you are a student at a top university studying politics, you will not read Lenin. You will not debate Lenin. Here are some examples of syllabuses at elite schools, I did not cherry pick, I could not find a single one that read even a pamphlet:
7 replies 70 retweets 984 likesShow this thread -
Harvard: Comparative Politics: https://canvas.harvard.edu/courses/4411/assignments/syllabus …. Yale: Comparative Politics: https://politicalscience.yale.edu/comparative-politics-reading-list … Political Theory: https://politicalscience.yale.edu/sites/default/files/political_theory-reading_list-2015.pdf … Berkeley: History of Political Philosophy: https://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~ngkolodny/S07Phil114.htm … Political Theory: https://bcourses.berkeley.edu/courses/1467146/assignments/syllabus …
2 replies 36 retweets 562 likesShow this thread -
Princeton: Political Theory: https://registrar.princeton.edu/course-offerings/course-details?courseid=005277&term=1194 … Modern Political Theory: https://registrar.princeton.edu/course-offerings/course-details?term=1204&courseid=005287 … Radical Political Theory: https://registrar.princeton.edu/course-offerings/course-details?term=1204&courseid=011318 … Columbia: Political Theory I: https://polisci.columbia.edu/content/political-theory-i … University of Chicago: Political Theory: https://cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/voices.uchicago.edu/dist/f/847/files/2018/01/Intro-PT-Syllabus-2017-1qkmj7v.pdf …
2 replies 30 retweets 551 likesShow this thread -
Marx appears a couple times very briefly, but far less than, say, articles from The Economist. Harvard in particular seems to more or less openly base their courses on capitalist propaganda. So why can't we read or discuss Lenin? Even in an adversarial way?
4 replies 74 retweets 1,054 likesShow this thread -
The reason is simple. Lenin not only lucidly wrote about the contradictions in our own system, which go so deep that they cannot be resolved by minor alterations or incremental "progress", he also wrote about what to do. He wasn't a moralist or utopian trying to show his virtue.
9 replies 136 retweets 1,361 likesShow this thread -
What is dangerous about Lenin is that he talked about actually destroying the system in reality, not just theorizing about what is wrong with it. In other words, Lenin was serious. This kind of thing can't be tolerated. It can't even be discussed, apparently.
8 replies 159 retweets 1,389 likesShow this thread -
What would we say about the USSR if Adam Smith was never taught? Never discussed? Most Americans hate communism, but can't define it. What would we say if Soviet citizens hated capitalism without reading capitalist thinkers? We'd call it brainwashing, censorship, and propaganda.
15 replies 288 retweets 1,951 likesShow this thread -
In America, the supposed land of free speech, we cannot even debate whether or not we should change our own economic system. Anyone who wishes to get rid of capitalism is banned from every institution with any power over our ideas. We do not have academic freedom, or free speech.
21 replies 225 retweets 1,688 likesShow this thread
-
-
Replying to @eigenrobot @existentialcoms
thank you so much for highlighting this gem
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.