-
-
interesting how many ppl are coming at this like its a "trump" vs "who" issue very not the calculus i care about at all expect this is how most ppl are viewing it tho one more stupid fucking layer
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think this one deserves a “Wheeeeeeeeee”.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even more of its funding will come from China, and that is Bad.
-
yes that is one concern and a major risk
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Destroying failed globalist institutions is good
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If I have to pick sides the WHO has eradicated smallpox trump has.... hm
-
unfortunately those are not the sides to consider and also that WHO is dead
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
it's good next step: create a "free world health organization" funded by the amount being cut and invite taiwan to join
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm not one to ever come in defence of Trump, but the WHO massively dropped the ball on this one. I'm not sure how much Tedros Ghebreyesus is really responsible for any of it, I feel like it's more institutional than that. But they definitely played this down for the longest time
-
Oh yeah they suck ass not debating that
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
