basically, idea in 1-3 seems to be to having the federal government step in to pay for everything for "the duration of the crisis"
-
-
Show this thread
-
idea seems to be to freeze existing contracts in time and keep payments flowing to avert a consumer debt crisis kicking off a broader financial crisis
Show this thread -
also for small businesses which seems likely to mostly help restaurants I think
Show this thread -
(I am not a macroeconomist and you should read my analysis in that light)
Show this thread -
This seems likely to prevent a lot of the risks I've been worried about for this economic crisis. So, what are the potential risks it introduces?
Show this thread -
Seems like a major one is inflation (mostly this would be bad for creditors with existing nominally-denominated debts, which . . . probably fine), although this seems a lesser evil than the alternative deflation
Show this thread -
Second one is more serious How long does this support--this enormous Intervention--last? How does it get rolled back? At all, and also in such a way that it doesn't provoke a new crisis? I am extremely uneasy about this component.

Show this thread -
Third is holy shit this is uncharted territory and no one knows what will happen and THAT also makes me nervous
Show this thread -
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
my thought too
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.