this seems correct tho there are also substantial postrat-ish critiques of rat causes celebres that basically boil down to "this is not ''rational''''''' you are only doing it because of your preferred aesthetic which is fine in abstract except your aesthetic is objectively bad"https://twitter.com/nosilverv/status/1227597453521801216 …
-
-
If two people see two completely different attitudes, then speaking as if that is 'the attitude', rather than compositional pieces and your own interpretation is model malpractice unless asking only for in-group approval (which is why I hate GMS framework)
-
The whole thing would land best as a meta-critique of rationalists trying to understand the differences between them and post-rats, in a kind of sort of 'look how stupid this is when we do it'
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.