People I respect more with backgrounds in bio and epidemiology are more worried, though not shrill. Would I pay $300 to potentially change my survival outcomes by .1%? I probably should.
-
-
Replying to @orthonormalist @sgodofsk and
to get to that sort of number you need something like 80,000 US cases
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AlexGodofsky @orthonormalist and
(and that's assuming 100% efficacy of the preventative measure, and 0% efficacy of any other things you might do in the intermediate time)
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @AlexGodofsky @orthonormalist and
also wearing mopp sucks ass
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @sgodofsk @AlexGodofsky and
I think that 80,000 US cases is not out of the realm of probability (though I wouldn't call it likely)--and I'd like this piece of gear anyway. I'll probably watch the tracker over the weekend.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @orthonormalist @sgodofsk and
right, 80,000 is not impossible, but say the odds are 25% (which seems very high) - then you are paying $1200 per 0.1% chance
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MimeticValue @AlexGodofsky and
Check out George Henderson
@puddleg Very good information and I think you'll find it usefulpic.twitter.com/8sVU6VfitB
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @liuzirou @MimeticValue and
Luckily I get Selenium via Legion Athletics multivitamin
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
luckily I get selenium via the Moon
-
-
Replying to @eigenrobot @orthonormalist and
luckily I get selenium via my Rails Gemfile
0 replies 0 retweets 5 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.