A GRAND COMPROMISE APPEARS 1. no more studies about race/sex/whatever differences 2. more generally no studies to be published without a Stats PhD co-author from a top 20 department and a simultaneous publication in a stats journal defending whatever bullshit methods are used
-
-
I mean you should take the objections seriously though because they're probably right for all of the usual reasons
-
I will never take anything seriously
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"All studies suck but some are useful" -- something George Box did not say
-
he SHOULD have
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
on a philosophical level I don't agree with praxis and austrian economists' views about empiricism but like, on a practical--shall we say, empirical level--it seems like there's something to be said for it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.