whats interesting is that its not obviously sexist to say "a woman wouldnt be able to beat trump" I have no idea whether its true but its just an empirical claim (that has not been falsified, n=1) Theres no sexism intrinsic to it
-
-
So its interesting that this if true is somehow a black mark on Sander's Is it that you can't make arguments that might /possibly/ arise from unwoke notions? This seems uh limiting Or is it just observing differences across groups in any way?
Show this thread -
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Is that a woke premise?
-
I think so! Belief in widespread social bias from some groups against others?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Honestly, this is a plausible N=1 interpretation of 2008->2016. There are rural counties that had 30-point shifts from Obama to Trump. So clearly, racist Trump voters are willing to vote for a (well-spoken Ivy-educated) black man, but not a white woman.
-
2012 of course was "Let Detroit go bankrupt" aka "Destroy the industry that every single person in the rural Midwest is within '4 steps of monetary flows' from".
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.