Sure you COULD end up with this model from some sexist premises but you could just as easily get there with woke premises "We need horrible sexist male votes to plausibly win and a woman wouldnt get them"
-
-
Show this thread
-
So its interesting that this if true is somehow a black mark on Sander's Is it that you can't make arguments that might /possibly/ arise from unwoke notions? This seems uh limiting Or is it just observing differences across groups in any way?
Show this thread -
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It would be saying something really terrible about the voting public, rather than the woman in question.
-
That's a good point And going a little further: I'm guessing the people who find that quote repulsive are mostly the ones who also argue that the public is shitty in exactly the way that would lead to that quote being accurate (God that's a long sentence)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I am sympathetic to where you're going with this but surely empirical claims (of uncertain truth, or of any truth) can be sexist, whether or not you think this one is
-
would you mind providing an example of a true yet sexist claim?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
was 2016 an Opinion?

- Show replies
-
-
-
If Sanders said this in person to Warren, he may have been wrong (Warren had less of an integrity problem than HRC, and a few 100K votes would have made all the difference), but he was likely not expressing his own preference but his judgement of US voters. Too subtle for Twitter
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.