Aha Aha Figured it out Reading this thread it seems to me that "hate" is not the word to use Seems to me if the bare facts are accepted you might best characterize Rowling as _tolerating_ trans peoplehttps://twitter.com/alicegoldfuss/status/1207733012290400256 …
-
Show this thread
-
observations 1. if you are _tolerating_ someone rather than _embracing_ them they are probably your Outgroup 2. tolerance is better than war if you can manage it 3. a game theoetic model i just invented suggests (ii) is hard
4 replies 3 retweets 83 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @eigenrobot
Recently Converted Ronanist Retweeted Recently Converted Ronanist
This is a topic dear to mehttps://twitter.com/Bugs_Meany/status/1066455487078690822 …
Recently Converted Ronanist added,
Recently Converted Ronanist @Bugs_MeanyReplying to @matthew_d_green @sonyaellenmann and 2 others"You can...believe in freedom and also ... being tolerant and nice to people." A subject much-discussed over @ http://Reason.com H&R was the libertarian notion of "Tolerance vs Affirmation" tl;dr: The former is required but the latter is optional1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Bugs_Meany @eigenrobot
Recently Converted Ronanist Retweeted Recently Converted Ronanist
Recently Converted Ronanist added,
Recently Converted Ronanist @Bugs_MeanyI've never heard that specific formulation being used explicitly but it resonate with an idea that i'm familiar w/. The conflation of 'tolerance' with 'affirmation', such that bigotry becomes equated with a failure to applaud enthusiastically enough. https://twitter.com/Bugs_Meany/status/1069284579452817408 …1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @eigenrobot
Recently Converted Ronanist Retweeted Marianne Kirby
This was an interesting example from a few days ago where someone finally said it explicitly: you can't be a passive observer, if you aren't shedding blood for the cause you're the enemyhttps://twitter.com/TheRotund/status/1207031399137591296 …
Recently Converted Ronanist added,
Marianne KirbyVerified account @TheRotundY'all, I am seeing "fiscally conservative, socially liberal" creep out into conversation as a political position again. The problem is that this is an impossible position. You cannot be socially liberal and then refuse to pay for the socially liberal programs.Show this thread1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.