so A. seems like within a population there will probably a relatively (compared to SNPs especially) small number of consistently-appearing longer segments across generations, especially if some loci are quite a lot more likely to be the site of crossing over than others?
-
-
Show this thread
-
B. if you can identify these groups you might have a better time using them as features (vs SNPs) especially given eg role of introns in the regulation of expression?
Show this thread -
C. Seems like you could deduce the traits of (successful) founders of populations from these traits a la linguistic archaeology?
Show this thread -
-
OHOHOHOHO looks like ive just reinvented something (badly) again just like that time i worked myself up to reinventing shitty cryptographic hashes someday its gonna be something Newhttps://twitter.com/arguablywrong/status/1202803515782914048?s=19 …
Show this thread -
seriously tho
@arguablywrong's explanation above is great and worth readingShow this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
hell yeah
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I cant be stopped!!!!
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.