no, there would be no penalty at all. it wouldn't be mandatory. it would be provided as a public service. why does this seem bad to you? child care is a skill and it can be learned.
-
-
I'm skeptical that the people who would need to show up would show up, and that the teachers would competently impart skills to most parents, and that the curriculum would be a net positive even if conveyed also these institutions probably still exist in the form of Church
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
I think you're right that some churches provide some analogous services to some people who attend those services some of the time. now imagine if that was a social norm and was expected of all parents.
4 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
personally don't care for the idea of letting the community vote on how I raise my kids
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
surely you've heard the phrase "it takes a village to raise a child" your community is already voting on how you raise your kids in the status quo. your community is a stake-holder in this whether you like it or not. atomization and individualism are not the same thing.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
well so far the Community has in its wisdom elected to put kids in solitary confinement i hope you forgive me for my skepticism
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot @danlistensto and
two things both true: 1. current system is a dumpster fire 2. The Community will always have a vote in how you raise your kids, unless you literally go live in the forest as hermits
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @ded_ruckus @eigenrobot and
Society will find you in the forest...
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @ChrisExpTheNews @ded_ruckus and
this is why its important to become Powerful
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot @ChrisExpTheNews and
broke: recreational nukes woke: paterfamilias with nuclear deterrent
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes
Dune nobility had family atomics and the Bene Gesserit were STILL able to fuck everything up think about THAT
-
-
Replying to @eigenrobot @ded_ruckus and
psychic powers and Shai Hulud do beat tactical nukes, turns out
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @danlistensto @eigenrobot and
to be fair, Frank Herbert had to invent a religious prohibition against using nuclear weapons to deal with that. Shai-Hulud ain't nothin' a hundred kilotons won't handle.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.