mildly curious has anyone objected to the /methods/ in the paper? I assume that theyre bad because its a paper (I havent read it for the same reason) anyway real missed opportunity for people who dislike it afaicthttps://twitter.com/EstOdek/status/1194008923684179968 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @eigenrobot
halvorz ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Retweeted evo psych googling
halvorz ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ added,
evo psych googling @evopsychgoogleturns out ducrest cautioned NOT to generalise these findings to humans. not “because of genetic mutations” (as this paper frames it) but because the genes ducrest et al. describe are completely different to the genes associated with skin colour in humans: https://sci-hub.tw/10.1016/j.tree.2008.06.001 … pic.twitter.com/0dEeHjJgs8Show this thread1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.