-
-
do you see how tiny the numbers we’re talking about are? Less than 1 in 1000 cases are part of this 280g-threshold bump we’re talking about. This could easily be a coding error, or like 5 judges who wanted cases that trigger the statutory minimum classified this way...
-
Okay and here’s what’s REALLY bizarre: why is there no spike at *279*? You’d think that pre-police “tampering”, if the new law created any thresholds at all it would be dudes carrying 300g, 400g scaling it down to 275g. That doesn’t appear at all -
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.