more generally the axis on which you evaluate your ideas reveals the value system in which you operate "true" to "false" quirky to offensive aesthetic to unaesthetic interesting to boring kegan five is evaluating the axes themselves along the axes https://twitter.com/MWStory/status/1181119478974705664 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
kegan six is evaluating whether axis evaluation holistically makes sense anyway kegan seven is taking weed and running finally running WC on a day you took pto
4 replies 0 retweets 22 likesShow this thread -
kind of thinking that a major component of power levels is (i) the richness of the axes youve built to be available when you evaluate notions, and (ii) your skill in selecting the appropriate axes for any given situation (ii) seems obvious but (i) maybe less discussed?
2 replies 1 retweet 10 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @eigenrobot
Your logic is solid. I've often heard (i) described as "mental models." See a good discussion here from one of my favorite channels by Alain de Botton: "The chief enemy of good decisions is a lack of sufficient perspectives on a problem."https://youtu.be/okdsAZUTJ94
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Mellow_Mizz
oh lovely! always good when someone else has come up with something before I have, feels kind of validating :)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @eigenrobot
If you find his style a bit too prose-y for your taste, a lot of top thinkers (Farnam Street, James Clear, Charles Munger) have their own suggestions too. After a second look, I may have mis-read your tweet. By "richness of axes", did you mean quantity or granularity of axes?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
let's say a mix of the two--probably "vocabulary" is analogous
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.