Is it the norm to not teach economic history at the undergrad level? Wasn’t part of my major but it would have been incredibly valuable.
-
-
Economic history (IME) is taught occasionally at the 400-level when instructors have a particular interest in a subtopic (Latin America, Jews--um, this instructor was Jewish) but nothing systematic
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Undergrad micro absolutely is not state of the art unless *looks eigen up and down* you're one of them applied people
-
heh are they no longer prescribing mas-colell for PhD students? have we given up on Nash then?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
any recommendations for a good macro book for someone familiar with statistics?
-
just a paper "Macroeconomics and Reality" Sims (1980)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Actually all macro is trash nowadays as the academia collapsed into math models navel-gazing and people at least somewhat aware of the empirical reality got stuck post-2008 endlessly repeating WTF?
-
ug macro being trash is a subset of all macro being trash :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
might do you good depending on the instructor :)
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.