hm thinking about why its ok to go and enjoy say the Colosseum just on aesthetic grounds whereas this is bad how long in the past do we have to go to appreciate things independent of their negative social associationshttps://twitter.com/jbouie/status/1159490179008225280 …
-
-
wonder if we're all so infohazard poisoned we would shrivel and die in a world that returned to its preinternet state weve all seen far too much we stared into the void, stepped inside, measured for furniture, settled in, and are building an addition once the city approves it
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My conclusion on this is that detailed layered context-specific rules, historical contingencies etc are Fine Actually. In same way a business's mission is Make Money, yet they implement this via detailed internal processes & rules, not by saying "staff, go Make us some Money".
-
IMO the idea the rules it's best to follow ought to directly match the simplest description of what's Good trips people up in both directions. See "ackshually what I said is *technically* not racist!" on one hand, scope creep in form of eg """cultural appropriation"" on the other
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.