very tired and demoralized at work so heres something ive been thinking about an interesting thing that may have happened in the 20th century is that deliberately or not people got really good at wrecking norms
-
Show this thread
-
it seems like you break a norm by having an individual violate it in a very public manner as a way of testing the strength of a consensus--that is, you force enforcers of the norm to make good on threats against violations, or show that they no longer can, because . . .
5 replies 9 retweets 120 likesShow this thread -
. . . a public demonstration of a willingness to violate the norm gives people who privately disagreed with it to publicly oppose it, and if enough do this then you get a preference cascade away from the old equilibrium that quietly rotted away.
2 replies 8 retweets 92 likesShow this thread -
(Naturally, new norms can be created if you demonstrate publicly that you can fuck someone up for violating what was previously acceptable behavior, and people who disagree with the new norm are cowed into silence, generating a different preference cascade.)
3 replies 13 retweets 109 likesShow this thread -
Some technological developments that seem likely to have facilitated this: 1. Mass media. One person can violate a norm and be seen very broadly very quickly. Mass media is usually seen as a homogenizing force but it's not necessarily a stable homogeny
2 replies 5 retweets 88 likesShow this thread -
2. Discoveries that undermined the practical underpinning rationale for many old norms (eg, the pill) all at once; with many such changes, discarding norms became a norm itself 3. Refinement of norm violation as a political tool. Eg, lunch protests in the segregated South
2 replies 5 retweets 72 likesShow this thread -
4. Related to (2) and (3), norm violation as a subcultural norm itself. Curiously . . .
1 reply 4 retweets 58 likesShow this thread -
. . .in the Before Time, left-leaning groups were the main practitioners of norm violation as a tool or lifestyle, while conservatives (almost by definition) were custodians of existing norms. I see this situation as reversed today.
4 replies 12 retweets 105 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Yeah censorship is generally favored by the (movement) in power
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The thing to remember is freedom of speech was originally more of detente and most don't have a principled belief in it
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.