I don't actually know that factory farming is bad at least on its own terms Hard to judge whether a given life is worth living Hard to know ecologically too Do factory farmed animals have it worse than wildlife they + their feed crops displace? I'm not sure.https://twitter.com/EvanSandhoefner/status/1156653573565898753 …
-
-
fuck the animals factory farming is great because it makes it easier to afford food
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
this assumes that a factory life is like-for-like replacing a wild life. Ultimately, eating more plants just means there'll be fewer animals out there
-
so, in a way, and i admit im jumping a few steps here, in order to eliminate suffering you must first extinct all sentient life
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think the crux of the problem is that in factory farming, we are directly responsible for unbelievable amounts of suffering. If an animal starves to death in a pit out in the wild, that's just nature; if you throw an animal into a pit and watch it starve to death, that's evil.
-
dont make me poast a trollley problem image :)
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
so wilderness is hell which means almost all life has always been hell which means that asteroid strike might look pretty good
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Okay here's my two cents. The problem with factory farming is not the suffering, it's the complete removal of animals from what their lives should be like. This is a claim that there is a way lives should be. This can be looked at later.
-
So then the suffering of wildlife is embedded in the proper context of life which makes it much better.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The "empirically-correct" part is the one that's real interesting
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
