oh gosh I am glad they included scatterplots but gosh https://twitter.com/NicoleBarbaro/status/1134103469533618176 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
-
-
Replying to @KizunautFI
there are at least three problems here how many can u find
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot @KizunautFI
The choker interest starts at 1 and for some reason.. goes to 7? The sociosexual interest starts at.. 5? The data points look like a shotgun blast, yet The line looks like it has nothing to do with anything. The actual stats (R^2, etc) aren’t mentioned. Anything I missed?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Rusty on applied statistics... what do you call it when you have many more samples at some values of a variable than others? Like, there are tons of samples at Sociosexual Orientation ~20, but ONE (1) around 60. Don't know what to formally call that bias.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ValidOfPriors @CouchRambo and
The confidence in the sample std dev at some values (with, say, one sample) would be way way worse than others... doesn't seem valid to even make a linear regression from that.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
eigenrobot Retweeted eigenrobot
oops replied on a different branch these are all varyingly important critiques as wellhttps://twitter.com/eigenrobot/status/1134480553464324103?s=19 …
eigenrobot added,
-
-
Replying to @eigenrobot @ValidOfPriors and
This. There's clearly no correlation, *as you would expect*, since no matter your sexual orientation, chokers make everyone look sexier, regardless also of the sex & gender of the choker wearer.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.