Hunger Games probably is. I think where it fits your OP point is that neither Twilight nor Hunger Games is popularly regarded as works that are socially conservative or "anti-SJW" (regardless of whether they are--I've only read the Hunger Games side but wouldn't class it as...).
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @petergodofsky @sonyaellenmann and
HP strikes me as from an obviously liberal-minded author, but not in a way that suggests "She has an agenda!", i.e. I didn't find the world, setting, or tales especially obviously rhetorical (the way I do for say Atlas Shrugged). Of course, I was an adult when HP first came out.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @gamespotting @petergodofsky and
The Potterverse seems both internally-consistent in terms of its politics and evolution, but also externally-mirroring, in terms of reflecting the actual world, hence only "liberal" in the morality of its characters. (Of course, my being liberal-ish could be a major bias...)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @gamespotting @petergodofsky and
The last work of speculative fiction I read that seemed plainly "conservative", with a fairly public impact, was Starship Troopers (prior to the film, the silliness of which became increasingly clear as time passed).
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @gamespotting @petergodofsky and
I believe my ex told me the fantasy book series, The Black Company, was kinda socially conservative (but also probably more in the "military" sense, a la Starship Troopers). But this also doesn't enjoy the mass popularity at the scale of Twilight or Hunger Games..
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Can confirm
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.