-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
for balance heres the stoic version https://web.cs.dal.ca/~johnston/poetry/if.html …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
i think the serious and explicit answer is to cultivate private virtue almost any lindy conception of virtue will probably suffice when I say it I think I try to mean: consider returning to an infinite game, ie playing for the sake of play rather than playing to win
2 replies 1 retweet 14 likes -
Winning (in mindset) means producing the type of personality that can consistently win (against goals)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @orthonormalist @eigenrobot and
Be able to be satisfied with what you have, but always realize what you could do with more.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
depending on your mindset these too can be a type of play
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I think 'play' is an empty word
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
im very glad we get along in spite of having diametrically opposite sensibilities in many ways :)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Hah. I don't think it's a worthless word, I just think people ascribe too much to it. I think you use it here even broader than 'participation in recreation'.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
broader in the sense of activities that can be considered play but narrower in the sense that much recreation is not play at all!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.