this seems exactly wrong to me, like isn't Not Science a defining characteristic?https://twitter.com/_jordan_bates/status/1083099011320610817 …
-
-
would you say the engagement w phenomena inaccessible to rational methods tends to stay on the level of aesthetics / shitposting tho?
-
if so this approach could still be seen as a kind of backhanded compliment / sophisticated defense mechanism / means of pseudo-'engaging' without earnestly engaging / a way to 'have one's cake and eat it too'
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.