“According to Wikipedia” lol
-
-
Replying to @obviously420_69 @petergodofsky and
Stop this. You have been given references and refuse to read them.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @metorotem @rotemeren and
Correlation study, I read it. Cited 108 times, p good but not groundbreaking. But it’s one article, hasn’t been replicated. Solely Correlation analyses are not seen as particularly influential
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @petergodofsky @obviously420_69 and
This person is either a troll or a complete moron. You can't replicate a data analysis. The paper is not even about the IQ-SAT correlation. It gives references to it as an established fact.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @metorotem @rotemeren and
Have you never heard of a replication study? And it’s about the ACT, not the SAT
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @obviously420_69 @petergodofsky and
I refer you to the first sentence of my previous reply.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @petergodofsky @olivertraldi and
i regrat nothing
8:42 PM - 20 Dec 2018
1 reply
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.