counter-point: it is useful to be able to express negative affect in speech idioms and all of their proposed replacements are positive affect
-
-
-
hm mostly u know just Fresh
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
extraordinary
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I would agree to get rid of two birds with one stone if we can replace it with two McFlys with the same gun
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
i like "take the flower by the thorns" a lot -- but as a complement, not replacement, to "take the bull by the horns."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Take the flower by the thorns” really doesn’t work as a replacement for “take the bull by the horns.” Also, I am eating meat right now:
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
two birds, one scone, y'know what I'm sayin?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
i had to look it up but i especially like the first onepic.twitter.com/ge9RyjUORY
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Disagree. All of them are moronic and infantile, like the sort of euphemisms people use with small children.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.