Wonder if to some extent ingroup Content relies on a substrate of bad ideas that are wrong in interesting ways, or in changes of the distribution of boring bad ideas Or maybe better all of our bants are meta-plus and nothing's happening at the object level
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
seems inevitable in a logarchy
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Could be we're still way above historical norms but things have slowed from the fever pitch
- Show replies
-
-
-
So if I am interpreting this correctly, enlightenment relies upon us transcending our animal natures. The question for me then becomes, how can we be one with the natural world if we seek a path to wholly remove ourselves from it. This is half-baked tbh, idk, I'm high.
-
I'm well on my way down, inhalation vector vs ingestion I guess
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I mean catholic twitter debated fiercely about the spiritual significance of big cow, so that something
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I haven't really seen many new interesting ideas since ca. 2011 personally; nydwracu iirc, wei dai and others have talked about the internet dropping in quality with fall of blogs and rise of general shared content platforms coinciding temporally with the fall of Less Wrong
-
maybe something like post internet-dreamtime http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/09/this-is-the-dream-time.html …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.