Nevertheless I am risk averse and have a strong preference for a widely-implemented carbon tax. I care quite a lot about the preservation of biological systems, but I suspect direct habitat destruction is likely to remain a substantially greater threat on this front.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
yeah I'm risk-averse and I would very much like to see carbon taxes and nuclear energy become the norm but right now it seems like a classic academic grift
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
safe prediction about the future!
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
guess it depends on whether or how much the system is damping! But yeah I'm on record as risk-averse and supporting carbon taxes
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
there's a huge motte-bailey thing going on, motte is "moar carbon dioxide -> more warming" and the bailey is "this will cause more wildfires, hurricanes, apocalypse, blah blah, [insert species here] will go extinct, farms will collapse" everything is blamed on global warming
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.