oh fucking good https://twitter.com/lovecryption/status/1062555185246101504 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
Replying to @eigenrobot
Toxicology without doses is superstition, hormone disruption from stressing out about this shit is probably doing about as much damage as (rolls dice) 16, uh... plastic micropellets from beer can linings
3 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @arachnocapital2 @eigenrobot
man the touching receipts bpa studies are scary
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @freezing_cloud @eigenrobot
Oh neat, my undergrad institution did that shit on the first google hit > asked six male volunteers to handle paper containing isotopically labeled BPA for five minutes n=6 experiment fondling receipts for 5min, then 2h marinating in nitrile gloves. That's, uh, unusual
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
I'd like to read the original paper, which I can't even find named in any of the scawwy news stories on the first page of google results and also don't want to pay for How much BPA exposure is dangerous? What concentrations? I DUNNO SCARY CHEMICAL BAD
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @arachnocapital2 @freezing_cloud
As I mentioned earlier signalling cascades make very low concentrations potentially quite potent. Depending on the mechanism and on binding strengths and etc etc you might not need much at all.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot @freezing_cloud
Fair, but with no bounds on "not much" it's basically an open invite to freak out about any damn hypothetical exposure at all Natural experiment: What effects would you expect from "too much", and do normies exhibit them?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
declining sperm count and lower testosterone, potentially manifested in population grip strength? :D
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.